Okay, so here's an example of where one needs to strike a delicate balance between understating and overstating a caution. In a conversation with an administrator, the subject of appropriate use of the school department's computers (network, email, internet) came up. I have to admit that I hadn't read the district's policy in a few years, so I went back to read it again.
Part I says that access to the network is provided for educational purposes and research consistent with the school department's educational mission and goals. This might include corresponding about college, sports, activities, and work with former students, right? Wider community and lifelong learners and all that. Does it include swapping recipes? (Research) Kibbutzing about politics? That raunchy photoshopped picture of Britney Spears with Hillary Clinton's face superimposed is probably not included.
Part II notes that access is a privilege, and as such can be suspended.
Part III lists examples of inappropriate use, and allows for other inappropriate uses which are not listed there. That could be broad, and subjective, and for several years I've taken some comfort in the vagueness of it. I'm not sure I should.
PLEASE consider that wastefully using resources and using the network for private financial or commercial gain are explicitly prohibited. So is using the network for private or commercial advertising. [That's the other reason why there are no ads on this blog.]
I've certainly strayed from the proper use before, and I may be doing so with this posting. I put my trust in reasonable folks acting without malice. Nonetheless, having recently had conversations about this subject with an administrator, I think it is good if we all re-read, reflect, and restrain.